1111 Park Ave Suite L-150, Baltimore, MD 21201
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA is a personal injury attorney in Baltimore, Maryland with a 4.9-star rating across 367 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 365 reviews for this profile and analyzed 287 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 19% of retrieved reviews, 41% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.2.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (41%), case results (28%), and professionalism (15%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (41%), case results (28%), and professionalism (15%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA at 1111 Park Ave Suite L-150, Baltimore, MD 21201. The listing has 367 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 367 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 365 reviews and analyzed 287 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 19% of retrieved reviews, 41% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (50%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 19% of the reviews retrieved for Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 11% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 64.4/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 33.3th percentile | Compared with the fixed Baltimore, MD cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 367 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 365 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 287 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 19% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 41% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 11% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 96.2 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
64.4/100
Score percentile
33.3th percentile
Rating percentile
78.8th percentile
Review-count percentile
84.8th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 287 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
8.0%
23 matches: 21 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
4.2%
12 matches: 11 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Mar 20, 2018
Latest dated review
Mar 19, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
365 retrieved of 367 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
47
Average rating: 5.00/5
Average rating
+0.05 stars
5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 4.95/5 in the prior period
Review activity
-52 reviews
47 recent reviews vs. 99 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
40%
2 replies across 5 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
15%
55 replies across 360 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
The Baltimore Personal Injury Attorneys at HH&T have been fighting for the rights of the injured in for over 45 years. If you have sustained an injury, whether in an auto accident, truck accident, mot...
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 287 text reviews in the current build.
Q: FAQ #6 Do I need PIP?
A: Need no, want YES! As mentioned above PIP is invaluable after you are in an automobile accident. From helping you out if you can't return to work immediately following your accident to paying off some medicals which can affect the amount of money you walk away with after completion of your case.
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: FAQ #5 What is PIP?
A: Personal Injury Protection is an additional no-fault insurance benefit that pays lost wages and medical bills. The law firm of Hassan Hassan & Tuchman strongly recommends that you do not waive your pip insurance on your auto insurance policy. If you are involved in an automobile accident and are un...
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: FAQ #4 Will my medical bills be paid in the future with a worker’s comp case?
A: In Workers' Compensation related medical treatment to the injured body part(s) is covered from the original date of injury for the rest of your life.
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: FAQ #3 Will my insurance rates go up during a worker’s compensation case?
A: It is against the law to raise insurance rates on your automobile insurance for using PIP or personal injury protection.
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: FAQ #2 During a worker’s compensation case, how are my medical bills being paid for?
A: Accepted Workers' Compensation Claims medicals are paid by the insurance company of your employer. All medicals are paid based on the Maryland Fee Guide. All medicals should be provided to your attorney to submit to the insurance company for payment.
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: Do I have to pay money to hire you for an auto accident case?
A: Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, works all auto accident claims on a contingency fee basis. We only get paid if you get paid. You do not pay us directly for our services. Our fee is taken out from the settlement /trial result.
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA
Q: Are the moneys or rewards I get from a case taxable?
A: No. It's nontaxable.
— Zeanyanna Johnson
Q: FAQ #1: Do I have to pay money to hire you for a worker’s comp case?
A: For all workers' compensation cases, the Law Firm of Hassan Hassan & Tuchman work on a contingency basis. We only receive after a hearing or settlement of your claim. . All fees are paid directly by the Worker’s Compensation Commission and are dictated by Statute. You will never hand over money ...
— Hassan, Hassan & Tuchman, PA