Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 3, 2026

Goodrow Law Office Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

Law Chambers Building, 345 Franklin St, San Francisco, CA 94102

5 · 100 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 75.4 / 100
Within-market percentile
64.7th percentile
Evidence depth
Minimum evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Goodrow Law Office is a personal injury attorney in San Francisco, California with a 5.0-star rating across 100 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 100 reviews for this profile and analyzed 98 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 22% of retrieved reviews, 72% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 100.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (72%), professionalism (37%), and communication (27%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Goodrow Law Office review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Goodrow Law Office reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (72%), professionalism (37%), and communication (27%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Goodrow Law Office legitimate?

Goodrow Law Office is listed on Google as a public business profile at Law Chambers Building, 345 Franklin St, San Francisco, CA 94102, with 100 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Goodrow Law Office a good law firm?

Goodrow Law Office has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 100 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 100 reviews and analyzed 98 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 22% of retrieved reviews, 72% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Goodrow Law Office reviews complain about?

Goodrow Law Office reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Goodrow Law Office respond to reviews?

Goodrow Law Office has replied to 22% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 27% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score75.4/100Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile64.7th percentileCompared with the fixed San Francisco, CA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews100Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved100Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed98Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate22%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate72%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions27%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions37%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index100Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time147.6 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in San Francisco, CA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

75.4/100

Score percentile

64.7th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

52.9th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Minimum evidence from 98 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-45aa11b9ecc92c04
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-934733c43bba0bb1
Brand relationship
Goodrow Law Office

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

responsiveness delays

6.1%

6 matches: 5 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Outcome language (unverified)

4.1%

4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 82%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Feb 20, 2018

Latest dated review

Mar 2, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

100 retrieved of 100 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

2

Average rating: 5.00/5

Year-over-year comparison withheld

The retrieved history does not yet meet the full-window coverage and rating-count gate for a fair twelve-month comparison.

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1
Avg Review Length
328 chars
Local Guide %
10%

About

Since 2007, Goodrow Law Office has represented people in the San Francisco Bay Area and the State of California who have suffered tragic injuries, catastrophic injuries or the wrongful death of a fami...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
100 (100%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 100

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 72.4% of reviews
professionalism 36.7% of reviews
communication 26.5% of reviews
expertise 22.4% of reviews
case results 19.4% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in San Francisco

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 100 retrieved reviews and 98 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 3, 2026.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-03 09:45:44.
  • • 100 total Google reviews tracked; 100 reviews retrieved; 98 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Aug 3, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 09:57:09 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all San Francisco personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore California personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →