Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

650 California St 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

5
159 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in San Francisco, California with a 5.0-star rating across 159 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 160 reviews for this profile and analyzed 129 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 7% of retrieved reviews, 84% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 97.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (84%), professionalism (53%), and case results (36%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (84%), professionalism (53%), and case results (36%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers at 650 California St 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108. The listing has 159 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers a good law firm?

Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 159 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 160 reviews and analyzed 129 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 7% of retrieved reviews, 84% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (200%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 7% of the reviews retrieved for Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 29% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score77.1/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile82.4th percentileCompared with the fixed San Francisco, CA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews159Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved160Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed129Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate7%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate84%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions29%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index97.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in San Francisco, CA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

77.1/100

Score percentile

82.4th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

88.2th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 129 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-40841251377f10df
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-82b1c668b2200599
Brand relationship
Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

5.4%

7 matches: 7 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

5.4%

7 matches: 6 positive, 0 negative, 1 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

3.1%

4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Nov 28, 2013

Latest dated review

Apr 2, 2026

Retrieved coverage

1%

160 retrieved of 159 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

38

Average rating: 4.89/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.11 stars

4.89/5 in the recent period vs. 5.00/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+9 reviews

38 recent reviews vs. 29 in the prior period

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful deathproduct liability

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.9
Avg Review Length
548 chars
Local Guide %
19%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyTrial attorney

About

Welcome to Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger! We are a San Francisco based personal injury law firm with over 6 decades of 7 and 8 figure results! Our attorneys make sure to take into account you...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 129 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
7%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
84%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
53%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
36%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
24%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 175.1 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
157 (99%)
4 star
1 (<1%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 97.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 83.7% of reviews
professionalism 52.7% of reviews
case results 35.7% of reviews
communication 28.7% of reviews
expertise 27.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (200%)

Other Personal Injury in San Francisco

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 160 retrieved reviews and 129 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 2, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:46:50.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-04-02 13:49:01; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:24.
  • 159 total Google reviews tracked; 160 reviews retrieved; 129 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Apr 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 1% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all San Francisco personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore California personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →