Gillette Law, P.A. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

603 N Market St, Jacksonville, FL 32202

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
193 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Gillette Law, P.A. is a personal injury attorney in Jacksonville, Florida with a 4.9-star rating across 193 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 193 reviews for this profile and analyzed 167 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 0% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 14% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 92.8.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (46%), and communication (14%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Gillette Law, P.A. Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (46%), and communication (14%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Gillette Law, P.A. legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Gillette Law, P.A. at 603 N Market St, Jacksonville, FL 32202. The listing has 193 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Gillette Law, P.A. a good law firm?

Gillette Law, P.A. has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 193 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 193 reviews and analyzed 167 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 0% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 14% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Gillette Law, P.A. reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (17%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Gillette Law, P.A. respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 0% of the reviews retrieved for Gillette Law, P.A.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 14% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score66.8/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile25th percentileCompared with the fixed Jacksonville, FL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews193Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved193Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed167Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate0%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate65%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions14%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index92.8Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Jacksonville, FL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

66.8/100

Score percentile

25th percentile

Rating percentile

64.3th percentile

Review-count percentile

60.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 167 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-7eaf71c7acdd4032
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-97adb4d5f7bf274d
Brand relationship
Gillette Law, P.A.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

6.6%

11 matches: 11 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

1.8%

3 matches: 3 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 82%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Feb 27, 2016

Latest dated review

Mar 2, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

193 retrieved of 193 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

25

Average rating: 4.84/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.14 stars

4.84/5 in the recent period vs. 4.70/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-2 reviews

25 recent reviews vs. 27 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

0%

0 replies across 7 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

0%

0 replies across 186 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.4
Avg Review Length
202 chars
Local Guide %
14%

About

During his more than 20 years in practice, Jacksonville personal injury attorney Charlie J. Gillette, Jr. has served as a strong advocate for the people in the community of Jacksonville as well as oth...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 167 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
0%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
65%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
46%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews

Rating Distribution

5 star
184 (95%)
4 star
2 (1%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
5 (2.6%)
96% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 92.8

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 65.3% of reviews
professionalism 45.5% of reviews
communication 13.8% of reviews
case results 11.4% of reviews
expertise 10.8% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (16.7%)

Other Personal Injury in Jacksonville

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 193 retrieved reviews and 167 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 2, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:36:12.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-04-02 13:39:41; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:24.
  • 193 total Google reviews tracked; 193 reviews retrieved; 167 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Apr 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Jacksonville personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Florida personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Medical Malpractice cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →