Multi-location law firm review analysis
Also searched as: Dan Newlin
Law Leaderboard tracks 18,111 public Google reviews across 2 distinct Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys office profiles in 2 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.91/5. The table below shows why the office-level evidence matters before treating one brand name as one uniform experience.
Quick verdict from public review data
Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys's 2 tracked office profiles have a 4.91/5 review-count-weighted public Google rating across 18,111 reviews. The office ratings range from 4.9-5.0/5, so the office table is more useful than a single brand-wide label. Public feedback can support a shortlist, but it cannot establish legal ability, likely case results, or fit for a particular matter.
Tampa, Florida has the highest office rating in this dataset at 5/5 across 1,364 tracked reviews. Orlando, Florida has the lowest at 4.9/5 across 16,747 tracked reviews. This range describes the captured office profiles only and does not prove why experiences differ.
Across retrieved reviews, the weighted owner-reply signal for the tracked Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys offices is 0%. This measures public responses to Google reviews, not communication with clients during a case.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are poor communication (8%), slow process (3%), low settlement (3%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 2 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, newlinlaw.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Multi-office consistency benchmark
Multi-office brand dispersion shows how public-review evidence varies among offices associated with the same brand across the listed markets or profiles. A smaller or larger spread can add context when comparing locations, but it does not establish uniform service, legal ability, credentials, or results at any individual office.
points across eligible offices
population standard deviation
public rating points
Each denominator includes only offices whose result for that theme passed all publication gates.
Immutable brand ID: llb-brand-dan-newlin-injury-attorneys. Compare individual offices side by side.
Ordered by tracked public review volume. Ratings and counts are office-specific; the response and recommendation columns use the review sample available for each profile.
| Office | Evidence score | Local percentile | Evidence depth | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Owner replies | Recommend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orlando, Florida 7335 W Sand Lake Rd Ste 300, Orlando, FL 32819 | 81.2/100 | 77.5th | Extensive | 4.9/5 | 16,747 | 4,949 | 0% | 81% |
| Tampa, Florida 1408 N Westshore Blvd Suite 310, Tampa, FL 33607 | 85.3/100 | 100th | Strong | 5/5 | 1,364 | 430 | 0% | 86% |
The largest public review footprint in this dataset is Orlando, Florida, with 16,747 tracked reviews. Volume is not the same as quality.
Weighted across the office review-text samples where each label appears.
Labels derived from analyzed negative-review text; not verified complaint filings.
Law Leaderboard tracks 18,111 public Google reviews across 2 distinct Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys office profiles in 2 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.91/5. The current dataset retrieved 5,379 reviews and analyzed 5,379 review texts. Read the office table because experiences and review coverage vary by location.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 2 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, newlinlaw.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys in Tampa, Florida has the highest public Google rating in this dataset at 5/5 across 1,364 tracked reviews. Ties are broken by public review volume; this is not an endorsement or a prediction of service quality.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are poor communication (8%), slow process (3%), low settlement (3%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Office profiles are joined only when they share the configured firm website domain, then deduplicated by Google place ID or address. Aggregate ratings are weighted by each office's tracked review count. Response signals are weighted by retrieved reviews, and text-derived themes are weighted by analyzed review texts. See the national review benchmark for cross-market context and the full methodology for metric definitions.
Provenance