Brand aliases: Dan Newlin
1408 N Westshore Blvd Suite 310, Tampa, FL 33607
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys is a personal injury attorney in Tampa, Florida with a 5.0-star rating across 1,364 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 430 reviews for this profile and analyzed 430 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 0% of retrieved reviews, 86% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 41% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.6.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (86%), communication (41%), and professionalism (40%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (86%), communication (41%), and professionalism (40%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys at 1408 N Westshore Blvd Suite 310, Tampa, FL 33607. The listing has 1,364 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 1,364 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 430 reviews and analyzed 430 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 0% of retrieved reviews, 86% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 41% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are poor communication (33%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 0% of the reviews retrieved for Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 41% of analyzed review texts.
Yes. This evidence covers the Tampa, Florida office. Compare all tracked Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys offices before generalizing this location's rating, praise, or concern signals to the wider brand.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 85.3/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 100th percentile | Compared with the fixed Tampa, FL cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 1,364 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 430 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 430 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 0% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 86% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 41% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 98.6 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
85.3/100
Score percentile
100th percentile
Rating percentile
100th percentile
Review-count percentile
93.8th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 430 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
16.0%
69 matches: 67 positive, 2 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
7.4%
32 matches: 28 positive, 0 negative, 4 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
3.7%
16 matches: 15 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Apr 26, 2019
Latest dated review
Mar 8, 2026
Retrieved coverage
32%
430 retrieved of 1,364 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
188
Average rating: 4.97/5
Average rating
-0.02 stars
4.97/5 in the recent period vs. 4.99/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+35 reviews
188 recent reviews vs. 153 in the prior period
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Dan Newlin Injury Attorneys is a caring and compassionate law firm; our firm motto is "Excellence for our Clients." We have a successful track record for winning big for our clients and always going a...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 430 text reviews in the current build.