Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 2, 2026

WorkInjuryRights.com Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

701 Brickell Ave Ste 1550, Miami, FL 33131

4.8 · 335 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 70.6 / 100
Within-market percentile
35.7th percentile
Evidence depth
Moderate evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

WorkInjuryRights.com is a personal injury attorney in Miami, Florida with a 4.8-star rating across 335 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 339 reviews for this profile and analyzed 242 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 53% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 92.1.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (53%), professionalism (29%), and case results (20%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

WorkInjuryRights.com review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

WorkInjuryRights.com reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (53%), professionalism (29%), and case results (20%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is WorkInjuryRights.com legitimate?

WorkInjuryRights.com is listed on Google as a public business profile at 701 Brickell Ave Ste 1550, Miami, FL 33131, with 335 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is WorkInjuryRights.com a good law firm?

WorkInjuryRights.com has a 4.8/5 public Google rating across 335 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 339 reviews and analyzed 242 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 53% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do WorkInjuryRights.com reviews complain about?

WorkInjuryRights.com reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does WorkInjuryRights.com respond to reviews?

WorkInjuryRights.com has replied to 100% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 12% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score70.6/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile35.7th percentileCompared with the fixed Miami, FL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews335Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved339Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed242Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate53%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions29%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions20%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions8%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index92.1Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time136.9 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Miami, FL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

70.6/100

Score percentile

35.7th percentile

Rating percentile

25th percentile

Review-count percentile

75th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 242 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-d7620f8637c355f5
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-a0496a19d3bf5a00
Brand relationship
WorkInjuryRights.com

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

5.0%

12 matches: 12 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.7%

9 matches: 7 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.7%

4 matches: 3 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Apr 9, 2022

Latest dated review

Jul 23, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

335 retrieved of 335 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

16

Average rating: 4.50/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.33 stars

4.50/5 in the recent period vs. 4.83/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-186 reviews

16 recent reviews vs. 202 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

100%

18 replies across 18 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

100%

317 replies across 317 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.6
Avg Review Length
228 chars
Local Guide %
27%

Practice Areas

Employment attorney

About

With a decade of dedicated service, Work Injury Rights stands as a premier personal and employment injury law firm based in Miami. Since 2014, they have exclusively focused on representing injured wor...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
310 (93%)
4 star
7 (2.1%)
3 star
11 (3.3%)
2 star
2 (<1%)
1 star
5 (1.5%)
95% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 92.1

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 52.5% of reviews
professionalism 28.5% of reviews
case results 19.8% of reviews
communication 11.6% of reviews
speed 10.3% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Miami

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 339 retrieved reviews and 242 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:54:43.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:10; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:25.
  • • 335 total Google reviews tracked; 339 reviews retrieved; 242 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Miami personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Florida personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →