Winters & Yonker Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

601 W Swann Ave, Tampa, FL 33606

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.5
423 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Winters & Yonker is a personal injury attorney in Tampa, Florida with a 4.5-star rating across 423 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 423 reviews for this profile and analyzed 331 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 74.6.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (64%), professionalism (32%), and case results (22%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and slip and fall. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Winters & Yonker Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (64%), professionalism (32%), and case results (22%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Winters & Yonker legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Winters & Yonker at 601 W Swann Ave, Tampa, FL 33606. The listing has 423 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Winters & Yonker a good law firm?

Winters & Yonker has a 4.5/5 public Google rating across 423 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 423 reviews and analyzed 331 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Winters & Yonker reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (12%) and passed around (2%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Winters & Yonker respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 96% of the reviews retrieved for Winters & Yonker. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 19% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score62.6/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile16.7th percentileCompared with the fixed Tampa, FL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews423Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved423Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed331Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate96%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate64%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index74.6Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Tampa, FL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

62.6/100

Score percentile

16.7th percentile

Rating percentile

4.8th percentile

Review-count percentile

73.8th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 331 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-7f53d21c4ede931a
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-81263fd41ab31922
Brand relationship
Winters & Yonker

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.3
Avg Review Length
400 chars
Local Guide %
41%

About

Winters & Yonker Personal Injury Lawyers are experienced Tampa personal injury lawyers dedicated to helping accident victims get the compensation they deserve. We specialize in car accidents, truck ac...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 331 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
96%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
64%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
19%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
32%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 168.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
355 (84%)
4 star
15 (3.5%)
3 star
4 (<1%)
2 star
6 (1.4%)
1 star
43 (10%)
88% positive reviews 12% negative reviews Consistency index: 74.6

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 63.7% of reviews
professionalism 31.7% of reviews
case results 22.4% of reviews
communication 19.3% of reviews
speed 12.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (12.2%)
passed around (2.4%)

Other Personal Injury in Tampa

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 423 retrieved reviews and 331 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:44:33Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:30:48Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:56.
  • 423 total Google reviews tracked; 423 reviews retrieved; 331 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Tampa personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Florida personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Motorcycle Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →