915 Outer Rd, Orlando, FL 32814
Review evidence score
Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.
Todd Miner Law is a personal injury attorney in Orlando, Florida with a 4.9-star rating across 988 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 991 reviews for this profile and analyzed 898 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 70% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 94.5.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (38%), and case results (28%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
Todd Miner Law reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (38%), and case results (28%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Todd Miner Law is listed on Google as a public business profile at 915 Outer Rd, Orlando, FL 32814, with 988 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Todd Miner Law has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 988 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 991 reviews and analyzed 898 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 70% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
Todd Miner Law reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels unprofessional (13%), passed around (8%), and poor communication (4%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Todd Miner Law has replied to 70% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 21% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 77.3/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 71.9th percentile | Compared with the fixed Orlando, FL cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 988 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 991 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 898 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 70% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 65% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 21% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Professionalism mentions | 38% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism. |
| Case-results mentions | 28% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results. |
| Compassion mentions | 9% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care. |
| Consistency index | 94.5 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
| Average owner response time | 165.5 days | Mean delay between a public review and the owner reply. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
77.3/100
Score percentile
71.9th percentile
Rating percentile
75th percentile
Review-count percentile
90.6th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 898 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
7.6%
68 matches: 65 positive, 2 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
6.3%
57 matches: 41 positive, 1 negative, 15 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
1.6%
14 matches: 14 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Aug 16, 2011
Latest dated review
Jul 30, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
988 retrieved of 988 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
113
Average rating: 4.92/5
Average rating
-0.05 stars
4.92/5 in the recent period vs. 4.97/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+3 reviews
113 recent reviews vs. 110 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
50%
13 replies across 26 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
71%
686 replies across 962 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Todd Miner Law: Experienced personal injury and car accident attorneys in Orlando. We have won millions for victims involved in car accidents, motorcycle accidents, truck accidents, bicycle accidents,...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Q: Does your law firm deal with solar system issues from which the solar company is avoiding or not fixing the issues
A: Thank you for reaching out to us. We are a personal injury firm. We represent clients who have sustained injuries as a result of someone else’s negligence. Your matter appears to be outside of our firm’s scope of legal services.
— Todd Miner Law
Q: I have a attorney for a auto injury case,my stepdad is friends with the attorney,i was told that he can put a stop to it all is that true
A: Your stepdad does not have the legal authority to control your case unless: 1. You are under the age of 18, and 2. Your stepdad adopted you or is otherwise your legal guardian
— Todd Miner Law
Q: i was hit in the rear by a car at a red light and acceptance insurance is denying the claim saying that the driver was not on the policy even though he left the scene and no legal proof of him driving the car . can you help me i just want what is owe
A: Todd Miner Law Office did a great job for me. Mine was an underinsured claim.
— Lois P
Q: IT'S IT A VIOLATION OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSTIONAL RIGHTS TO BE PLACED IN 4 POINT RESTRAINTS JUST FOR POUNDING ON THE DOOR IN AN EVALUATION ROOM IN THE HALIFAX HOSPITAL
A: If hospital finds you a threat or possible threat to yourself or others . No its not a violation
— Bobby Brown
Provenance