Todd Miner Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

915 Outer Rd, Orlando, FL 32814

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
988 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Todd Miner Law is a personal injury attorney in Orlando, Florida with a 4.9-star rating across 988 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 991 reviews for this profile and analyzed 898 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 70% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 94.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (38%), and case results (28%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Todd Miner Law Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (65%), professionalism (38%), and case results (28%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Todd Miner Law legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Todd Miner Law at 915 Outer Rd, Orlando, FL 32814. The listing has 988 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Todd Miner Law a good law firm?

Todd Miner Law has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 988 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 991 reviews and analyzed 898 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 70% of retrieved reviews, 65% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Todd Miner Law reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (13%), passed around (8%), and poor communication (4%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Todd Miner Law respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 70% of the reviews retrieved for Todd Miner Law. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 21% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score77.3/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile71.9th percentileCompared with the fixed Orlando, FL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews988Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved991Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed898Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate70%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate65%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions21%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index94.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Orlando, FL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

77.3/100

Score percentile

71.9th percentile

Rating percentile

75th percentile

Review-count percentile

90.6th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 898 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-09cba3204a3bad3f
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-df917bfc1e167a57
Brand relationship
Todd Miner Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

7.6%

68 matches: 65 positive, 2 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

6.3%

57 matches: 41 positive, 1 negative, 15 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.6%

14 matches: 14 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Aug 16, 2011

Latest dated review

Jul 30, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

988 retrieved of 988 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

113

Average rating: 4.92/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.05 stars

4.92/5 in the recent period vs. 4.97/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+3 reviews

113 recent reviews vs. 110 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

50%

13 replies across 26 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

71%

686 replies across 962 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticewrongful deathdog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
5.1
Avg Review Length
414 chars
Local Guide %
28%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

About

Todd Miner Law: Experienced personal injury and car accident attorneys in Orlando. We have won millions for victims involved in car accidents, motorcycle accidents, truck accidents, bicycle accidents,...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated Contingency fee mentioned No fee unless recovery stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
No source-backed language list captured yet.
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
bicycle accident car accident dog bite medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident product liability slip and fall truck accident wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 898 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
70%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
65%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
21%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
38%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
28%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 165.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
952 (96%)
4 star
10 (1%)
3 star
3 (<1%)
2 star
4 (<1%)
1 star
19 (1.9%)
97% positive reviews 2% negative reviews Consistency index: 94.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 64.8% of reviews
professionalism 38% of reviews
case results 28.2% of reviews
communication 21.2% of reviews
dedication 11.1% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (12.5%)
passed around (8.3%)
poor communication (4.2%)

Questions & Answers

Q: Does your law firm deal with solar system issues from which the solar company is avoiding or not fixing the issues

A: Thank you for reaching out to us. We are a personal injury firm. We represent clients who have sustained injuries as a result of someone else’s negligence. Your matter appears to be outside of our firm’s scope of legal services.

— Todd Miner Law

Q: I have a attorney for a auto injury case,my stepdad is friends with the attorney,i was told that he can put a stop to it all is that true

A: Your stepdad does not have the legal authority to control your case unless: 1. You are under the age of 18, and 2. Your stepdad adopted you or is otherwise your legal guardian

— Todd Miner Law

Q: i was hit in the rear by a car at a red light and acceptance insurance is denying the claim saying that the driver was not on the policy even though he left the scene and no legal proof of him driving the car . can you help me i just want what is owe

A: Todd Miner Law Office did a great job for me. Mine was an underinsured claim.

— Lois P

Q: IT'S IT A VIOLATION OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSTIONAL RIGHTS TO BE PLACED IN 4 POINT RESTRAINTS JUST FOR POUNDING ON THE DOOR IN AN EVALUATION ROOM IN THE HALIFAX HOSPITAL

A: If hospital finds you a threat or possible threat to yourself or others . No its not a violation

— Bobby Brown

Other Personal Injury in Orlando

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 991 retrieved reviews and 898 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 2 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:08:29.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:11; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:23.
  • 988 total Google reviews tracked; 991 reviews retrieved; 898 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Orlando personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Florida personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Medical Malpractice cohort → Compare this office in the Motorcycle Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →