THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

8335 W Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89147

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.7
388 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 4.7-star rating across 388 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 388 reviews for this profile and analyzed 296 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 91% of retrieved reviews, 66% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 84.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (66%), professionalism (30%), and case results (27%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (66%), professionalism (30%), and case results (27%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys at 8335 W Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89147. The listing has 388 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys a good law firm?

THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 388 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 388 reviews and analyzed 296 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 91% of retrieved reviews, 66% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are poor communication (8%), slow process (8%), and passed around (4%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 91% of the reviews retrieved for THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 19% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score69.9/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile40th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews388Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved388Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed296Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate91%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate66%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index84.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

69.9/100

Score percentile

40th percentile

Rating percentile

33.3th percentile

Review-count percentile

60th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 296 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-74c2ecc5abd84f53
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-fe9503ce8f5afb6b
Brand relationship
THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurydog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.3
Avg Review Length
302 chars
Local Guide %
30%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorneys. THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys is the premier Las Vegas Law Firm with some of Nevada's best Personal Injury Attorneys. Our Law Firm has obtained millions of dollars i...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 296 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
91%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
66%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
19%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
27%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 150.9 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
346 (89%)
4 star
10 (2.6%)
3 star
7 (1.8%)
2 star
4 (1%)
1 star
21 (5.4%)
92% positive reviews 7% negative reviews Consistency index: 84.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 66.2% of reviews
professionalism 30.4% of reviews
case results 27.4% of reviews
communication 18.9% of reviews
speed 17.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

poor communication (8%)
slow process (8%)
passed around (4%)

Other Medical Malpractice in Las Vegas

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 388 retrieved reviews and 296 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:17Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:31:56Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:01.
  • 388 total Google reviews tracked; 388 reviews retrieved; 296 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →