Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 12, 2026

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

3490 Piedmont Rd NE #1206, Atlanta, GA 30305

5 · 92 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 78.1 / 100
Within-market percentile
75th percentile
Evidence depth
Minimum evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Atlanta, Georgia with a 5.0-star rating across 92 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 92 reviews for this profile and analyzed 83 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 76% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 100.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (76%), professionalism (36%), and compassion and care (30%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (76%), professionalism (36%), and compassion and care (30%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers legitimate?

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers is listed on Google as a public business profile at 3490 Piedmont Rd NE #1206, Atlanta, GA 30305, with 92 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers a good law firm?

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 92 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 92 reviews and analyzed 83 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 76% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers reviews complain about?

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers respond to reviews?

The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers has replied to 100% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 17% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score78.1/100Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile75th percentileCompared with the fixed Atlanta, GA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews92Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved92Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed83Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate76%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions17%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions36%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions30%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index100Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time115.1 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Atlanta, GA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

78.1/100

Score percentile

75th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

8.3th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Minimum evidence from 83 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-bdb41174516fbfc5
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-76cfaa233092a794
Brand relationship
The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers

Nearby evidence comparisons

The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.8
Avg Review Length
410 chars
Local Guide %
18%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesMedical lawyerTrial attorney

About

At The Moses Firm: Atlanta Medical Malpractice Lawyers, we help people during some of the most challenging moments of their lives. If you or someone you love has suffered harm due to medical negligenc...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
92 (100%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 100

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 75.9% of reviews
professionalism 36.1% of reviews
compassion and care 30.1% of reviews
dedication 26.5% of reviews
expertise 21.7% of reviews

Other Medical Malpractice in Atlanta

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 92 retrieved reviews and 83 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:22Z.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:29:23Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:00.
  • • 92 total Google reviews tracked; 92 reviews retrieved; 83 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Atlanta medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →