Steinger, Greene & Feiner Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

2101 Park Center Dr Suite 160, Orlando, FL 32835

4.8
630 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Steinger, Greene & Feiner is a personal injury attorney in Orlando, Florida with a 4.8-star rating across 630 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 573 reviews for this profile and analyzed 358 text reviews. The firm replies to 63% of public reviews, 43% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 87.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (43%), professionalism (24%), and speed (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews630Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved573Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed358Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate63%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate43%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index87.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful deathdog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
5.7
Avg Review Length
218 chars
Local Guide %
18%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 358 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
63%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
43%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
24%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
6%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 130.6 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
574 (91%)
4 star
25 (4%)
3 star
11 (1.7%)
2 star
3 (<1%)
1 star
17 (2.7%)
95% positive reviews 5% negative reviews Consistency index: 87.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 43.3% of reviews
professionalism 24% of reviews
speed 17.6% of reviews
communication 13.4% of reviews
case results 12.6% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (35.3%)
poor communication (5.9%)

Recent Reviews

Regina stinson

I'am so Grateful for your firm doing everything to help me out with my case you guys were very helpful and letting me know the details and I thank you.

3 days ago
Alexis
3 days ago
Gnae Hillman
4 days ago
Kim O Rourke

Your people where very nice

4 days ago
Quadir Rasul (Q) Local Guide
4 days ago

Other Personal Injury in Orlando

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 573 retrieved reviews and 358 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 13:08:29.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 13:08:29.
  • 630 total Google reviews tracked; 573 reviews retrieved; 358 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 13:08:29, reviews: 2026-04-06 17:00:36, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:26.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Orlando personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews