Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

180 Livingston St Ste 2, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.7
530 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. is a personal injury attorney in Brooklyn, New York with a 4.7-star rating across 530 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 530 reviews for this profile and analyzed 317 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 84% of retrieved reviews, 30% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 79.2.

The most common review themes are professionalism (35%), explicit recommendation (30%), and case results (14%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are professionalism (35%), explicit recommendation (30%), and case results (14%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. at 180 Livingston St Ste 2, Brooklyn, NY 11201. The listing has 530 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. a good law firm?

Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 530 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 530 reviews and analyzed 317 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 84% of retrieved reviews, 30% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (11%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 84% of the reviews retrieved for Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 10% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score59.7/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile26.3th percentileCompared with the fixed Brooklyn, NY cohort.
Tracked Google reviews530Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved530Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed317Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate84%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate30%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions10%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index79.2Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Brooklyn, NY

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

59.7/100

Score percentile

26.3th percentile

Rating percentile

31.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

89.5th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 317 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-d0e346f0af434079
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-55100978ba0722cc
Brand relationship
Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
3.6
Avg Review Length
196 chars
Local Guide %
23%

Practice Areas

Employment attorneyLaw firmAttorneySocial security attorneyTrial attorney

About

Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. has more than 90 years of fighting hard and winning big for injured New Yorkers. We have served over 100,000 clients and recovered billions in a...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 317 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
84%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
30%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
35%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 205.4 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
447 (84%)
4 star
43 (8.1%)
3 star
10 (1.9%)
2 star
5 (<1%)
1 star
25 (4.7%)
91% positive reviews 7% negative reviews Consistency index: 79.2

What Clients Praise

professionalism 34.7% of reviews
explicit recommendation 30.3% of reviews
case results 13.9% of reviews
expertise 11.7% of reviews
speed 10.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (10.7%)

Other Workers Compensation in Brooklyn

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 530 retrieved reviews and 317 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:16Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:36:08Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:01.
  • 530 total Google reviews tracked; 530 reviews retrieved; 317 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Brooklyn workers compensation lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →