Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. is a personal injury attorney in Brooklyn, New York with a 4.7-star rating across 530 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 530 reviews for this profile and analyzed 317 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 84% of retrieved reviews, 30% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 79.2.
The most common review themes are professionalism (35%), explicit recommendation (30%), and case results (14%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Case Types Mentioned in Reviews
medical malpracticeworkplace injury
Quick Stats
- Reviews/Month
- 3.6
- Avg Review Length
- 196 chars
- Local Guide %
- 23%
Practice Areas
Employment attorneyLaw firmAttorneySocial security attorneyTrial attorney
About
Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano L.L.P. has more than 90 years of fighting hard and winning big for injured New Yorkers. We have served over 100,000 clients and recovered billions in a...
What Our Data Shows
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency,
praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Performance Metrics
Based on analysis of 317 text reviews in the current build.
Owner Response Rate
84%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
30%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
35%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 205.4 days
Rating Distribution
91% positive reviews 7% negative reviews Consistency index: 79.2
What Clients Praise
professionalism 34.7% of reviews
explicit recommendation 30.3% of reviews
case results 13.9% of reviews
expertise 11.7% of reviews
Common Concerns (from negative reviews)