Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 2, 2026

Naqvi Accident Injury Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

9500 W Flamingo Rd Ste 104, Las Vegas, NV 89147

4.9 · 1,420 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 71.8 / 100
Within-market percentile
40.5th percentile
Evidence depth
Extensive evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Naqvi Accident Injury Law is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 4.9-star rating across 1,420 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,426 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,337 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 36% of retrieved reviews, 55% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 94.4.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (55%), professionalism (24%), and case results (19%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Naqvi Accident Injury Law review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Naqvi Accident Injury Law reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (55%), professionalism (24%), and case results (19%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Naqvi Accident Injury Law legitimate?

Naqvi Accident Injury Law is listed on Google as a public business profile at 9500 W Flamingo Rd Ste 104, Las Vegas, NV 89147, with 1,420 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Naqvi Accident Injury Law a good law firm?

Naqvi Accident Injury Law has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 1,420 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,426 reviews and analyzed 1,337 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 36% of retrieved reviews, 55% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 19% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Naqvi Accident Injury Law reviews complain about?

Naqvi Accident Injury Law reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels slow process (8%), poor communication (6%), and unprofessional (3%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Naqvi Accident Injury Law respond to reviews?

Naqvi Accident Injury Law has replied to 36% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 19% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score71.8/100Extensive evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile40.5th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews1,420Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,426Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,337Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate36%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate55%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions24%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions19%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions8%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index94.4Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time58.7 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

71.8/100

Score percentile

40.5th percentile

Rating percentile

47.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

88.1th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

11.9th percentile

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Extensive evidence from 1,337 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-433b45092a3608f3
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-0f4ecd67a8415944
Brand relationship
Naqvi Accident Injury Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

7.6%

101 matches: 96 positive, 5 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.7%

50 matches: 39 positive, 0 negative, 11 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.6%

22 matches: 21 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Sep 13, 2013

Latest dated review

Jul 29, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

1,420 retrieved of 1,420 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

295

Average rating: 4.94/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.03 stars

4.94/5 in the recent period vs. 4.91/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-7 reviews

295 recent reviews vs. 302 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

4%

2 replies across 50 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

36%

492 replies across 1,370 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
8.5
Avg Review Length
267 chars
Local Guide %
20%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

About

At Naqvi Injury Law, we fight to maximize compensation for injury victims in Las Vegas. Led by award-winning attorney Farhan Naqvi, our firm has recovered millions for clients injured in car, truck, a...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated Contingency fee mentioned 24/7 availability stated Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
Spanish
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
bicycle accident brain injury car accident medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident product liability slip and fall truck accident wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
1355 (95%)
4 star
15 (1.1%)
3 star
6 (<1%)
2 star
3 (<1%)
1 star
41 (2.9%)
97% positive reviews 2% negative reviews Consistency index: 94.4

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 55.1% of reviews
professionalism 23.9% of reviews
case results 19.1% of reviews
communication 18.7% of reviews
compassion and care 7.6% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

● slow process (8.3%)
● poor communication (5.6%)
● unprofessional (2.8%)

Other Personal Injury in Las Vegas

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 1,426 retrieved reviews and 1,337 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • • 4 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 11:42:38.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:21.
  • • 1,420 total Google reviews tracked; 1,426 reviews retrieved; 1,337 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Nevada personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →