My 25% Lawyer Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

3355 Lenox Rd NE #750, Atlanta, GA 30326

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.6
1,773 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

My 25% Lawyer is a personal injury attorney in Atlanta, Georgia with a 4.6-star rating across 1,773 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,780 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,672 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 65% of retrieved reviews, 63% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 24% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 78.1.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (63%), communication (24%), and professionalism (23%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

My 25% Lawyer Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (63%), communication (24%), and professionalism (23%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is My 25% Lawyer legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for My 25% Lawyer at 3355 Lenox Rd NE #750, Atlanta, GA 30326. The listing has 1,773 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is My 25% Lawyer a good law firm?

My 25% Lawyer has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 1,773 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,780 reviews and analyzed 1,672 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 65% of retrieved reviews, 63% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 24% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do My 25% Lawyer reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (15%), poor communication (7%), and slow process (3%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does My 25% Lawyer respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 65% of the reviews retrieved for My 25% Lawyer. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 24% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score66.2/100Extensive evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile24.4th percentileCompared with the fixed Atlanta, GA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews1,773Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,780Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,672Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate65%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate63%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions24%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index78.1Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Atlanta, GA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

66.2/100

Score percentile

24.4th percentile

Rating percentile

19.5th percentile

Review-count percentile

90.2th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Extensive evidence from 1,672 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-08bbef2b256b0c57
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-30023bbad7f90158
Brand relationship
My 25% Lawyer

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

6.9%

115 matches: 91 positive, 23 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

5.4%

90 matches: 74 positive, 0 negative, 16 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.6%

26 matches: 19 positive, 7 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Apr 12, 2021

Latest dated review

Aug 2, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

1,773 retrieved of 1,773 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

42

Average rating: 4.26/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.41 stars

4.26/5 in the recent period vs. 4.67/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-606 reviews

42 recent reviews vs. 648 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

63%

104 replies across 166 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

62%

1,001 replies across 1,607 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
25.8
Avg Review Length
240 chars
Local Guide %
12%

About

At My 25% Lawyer, we charge a flat 25% attorney fee regardless of the size of your case — so you keep more of your settlement. If you’ve been injured in an accident, we understand how overwhelming th...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated No fee unless recovery stated 24/7 availability stated Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
No source-backed language list captured yet.
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
car accident medical malpractice motorcycle accident slip and fall

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 1,672 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
65%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
63%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
24%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
23%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
21%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
4%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 161.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
1527 (86%)
4 star
79 (4.5%)
3 star
9 (<1%)
2 star
18 (1%)
1 star
140 (7.9%)
91% positive reviews 9% negative reviews Consistency index: 78.1

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 63.2% of reviews
communication 24% of reviews
professionalism 23.2% of reviews
case results 21.4% of reviews
expertise 8.4% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (14.6%)
poor communication (7%)
slow process (2.5%)

Other Personal Injury in Atlanta

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 1,780 retrieved reviews and 1,672 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 11:25:22.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:20.
  • 1,773 total Google reviews tracked; 1,780 reviews retrieved; 1,672 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Atlanta personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Georgia personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →