Hog Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

115 S Fielding Ave, Tampa, FL 33606

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

5
154 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Hog Law is a personal injury attorney in Tampa, Florida with a 5.0-star rating across 154 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 154 reviews for this profile and analyzed 149 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 69% of retrieved reviews, 81% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (81%), professionalism (48%), and case results (20%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Hog Law Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (81%), professionalism (48%), and case results (20%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Hog Law legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Hog Law at 115 S Fielding Ave, Tampa, FL 33606. The listing has 154 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Hog Law a good law firm?

Hog Law has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 154 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 154 reviews and analyzed 149 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 69% of retrieved reviews, 81% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Hog Law reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Hog Law. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Hog Law respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 69% of the reviews retrieved for Hog Law. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 15% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score78/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile72.2th percentileCompared with the fixed Tampa, FL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews154Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved154Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed149Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate69%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate81%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions15%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index98Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Tampa, FL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

78/100

Score percentile

72.2th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

16.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 149 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-ed1a236bf3d4c959
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-dcfb80905d09d0e5
Brand relationship
Hog Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.9
Avg Review Length
394 chars
Local Guide %
28%

About

Hog Law is a law firm specializing in representation of those injured in motorcycle accidents throughout Tampa Bay and the state of Florida.

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 149 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
69%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
81%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
48%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
20%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 194.2 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
151 (98%)
4 star
3 (1.9%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 98

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 81.2% of reviews
professionalism 47.7% of reviews
case results 20.1% of reviews
expertise 17.4% of reviews
dedication 16.1% of reviews

Other motorcycle-accident in Tampa

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 154 retrieved reviews and 149 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:31Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:30:30Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:00.
  • 154 total Google reviews tracked; 154 reviews retrieved; 149 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Tampa motorcycle-accident lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →