Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

99 Osgood Pl #100, San Francisco, CA 94133

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
123 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile Compare all tracked Harris Personal Injury Lawyers locations

Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. is a personal injury attorney in San Francisco, California with a 4.9-star rating across 123 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 123 reviews for this profile and analyzed 122 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (30%), and expertise (16%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident and motorcycle. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (30%), and expertise (16%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. at 99 Osgood Pl #100, San Francisco, CA 94133. The listing has 123 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. a good law firm?

Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 123 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 123 reviews and analyzed 122 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 32% of the reviews retrieved for Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 13% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score70/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile41.2th percentileCompared with the fixed San Francisco, CA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews123Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved123Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed122Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate32%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate71%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in San Francisco, CA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

70/100

Score percentile

41.2th percentile

Rating percentile

70.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

64.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 122 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-bf6538ac46163b42
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-harris-personal-injury-lawyers

Nearby evidence comparisons

The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

2.5%

3 matches: 3 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Apr 25, 2019

Latest dated review

Mar 17, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

123 retrieved of 123 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

11

Average rating: 4.73/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.27 stars

4.73/5 in the recent period vs. 5.00/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-2 reviews

11 recent reviews vs. 13 in the prior period

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycle

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.5
Avg Review Length
206 chars
Local Guide %
15%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. is a trusted San Francisco personal injury law firm proudly serving clients across San Francisco County and the Bay Area. Our skilled San Francisco injury attorney...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 122 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
32%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
71%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
12%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
2%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 142.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
120 (98%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
2 (1.6%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
98% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 71.3% of reviews
professionalism 29.5% of reviews
expertise 15.6% of reviews
communication 13.1% of reviews
case results 12.3% of reviews

Questions & Answers

Q: Is a personal injury settlement taxable?

A: Most personal injury settlements in California are not taxable when they compensate you for physical injuries or sickness, including medical bills and pain and suffering. However, portions of a settlement that cover lost wages, punitive damages, or interest may be taxable. To avoid unexpected tax is...

— Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.

Q: My dog was attacked by another dog – what can I do?

A: If your dog was attacked by another dog in California, you should first get your pet immediate veterinary care, then exchange contact information with the other dog’s owner. You can file a claim against the at-fault owner for veterinary bills and related costs, since California law holds owners resp...

— Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.

Q: I was injured in a motorcycle accident but wasn’t wearing a helmet. Can I still recover damages from the other driver?

A: Yes. California’s comparative negligence allows recovery, though not wearing a DOT-approved helmet may reduce your compensation proportionally.

— Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.

Q: Who is liable in a truck accident – the driver or the trucking company?

A: Liability can extend to both. The company is often vicariously liable and may be directly liable for negligent hiring, training, or maintenance.

— Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.

Q: How long after a car accident can I claim injury?

A: You have 2 years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit in California.

— Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.

Other Personal Injury in San Francisco

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 123 retrieved reviews and 122 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 2, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:46:50.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-04-02 13:48:08; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:24.
  • 123 total Google reviews tracked; 123 reviews retrieved; 122 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Apr 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all San Francisco personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore California personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →