Goldberg Injury Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

6010 S Rainbow Blvd Ste A1, Las Vegas, NV 89118

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

5
377 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Goldberg Injury Law is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 5.0-star rating across 377 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 376 reviews for this profile and analyzed 349 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 99% of retrieved reviews, 75% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (75%), case results (30%), and communication (29%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, and dog bite. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Goldberg Injury Law Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (75%), case results (30%), and communication (29%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Goldberg Injury Law legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Goldberg Injury Law at 6010 S Rainbow Blvd Ste A1, Las Vegas, NV 89118. The listing has 377 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Goldberg Injury Law a good law firm?

Goldberg Injury Law has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 377 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 376 reviews and analyzed 349 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 99% of retrieved reviews, 75% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Goldberg Injury Law reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (25%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Goldberg Injury Law respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 99% of the reviews retrieved for Goldberg Injury Law. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 29% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score86/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile100th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews377Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved376Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed349Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate99%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate75%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions29%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index98Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

86/100

Score percentile

100th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

53.3th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 349 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-b27bc0f1cf925c2e
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-090c11e480c69160
Brand relationship
Goldberg Injury Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpracticedog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.9
Avg Review Length
309 chars
Local Guide %
10%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorney

About

At Goldberg Injury Law in Las Vegas, clients are our top priority. Our team of experienced personal injury professionals navigates the injury claim process diligently, aiming for maximum compensation ...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 349 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
99%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
75%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
23%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 143.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
371 (98%)
4 star
1 (<1%)
3 star
2 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
3 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 98

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 74.8% of reviews
case results 29.8% of reviews
communication 28.9% of reviews
professionalism 22.9% of reviews
speed 15.2% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (25%)

Other Medical Malpractice in Las Vegas

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 376 retrieved reviews and 349 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:18Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:31:35Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:58.
  • 377 total Google reviews tracked; 376 reviews retrieved; 349 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →