Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

14426 E Evans Ave, Aurora, CO 80014

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.6
2,291 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado is a personal injury attorney in Aurora, Colorado with a 4.6-star rating across 2,291 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 2,291 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,602 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 37% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 74.9.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (37%), case results (18%), and professionalism (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (37%), case results (18%), and professionalism (18%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado at 14426 E Evans Ave, Aurora, CO 80014. The listing has 2,291 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado a good law firm?

Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 2,291 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 2,291 reviews and analyzed 1,602 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 37% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (13%), poor communication (4%), and slow process (3%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 66% of the reviews retrieved for Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Aurora, Colorado. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 13% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score56.7/100Extensive evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile5.3th percentileCompared with the fixed Aurora, CO cohort.
Tracked Google reviews2,291Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved2,291Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,602Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate66%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate37%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index74.9Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Aurora, CO

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

56.7/100

Score percentile

5.3th percentile

Rating percentile

10.5th percentile

Review-count percentile

100th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Extensive evidence from 1,602 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-f400fa06aa1a4462
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-4e4a2b6407e05fda
Brand relationship
Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers - Denver, Colorado

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful deathdog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
10.5
Avg Review Length
230 chars
Local Guide %
26%

Practice Areas

Employment attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

Frank Azar Car & Truck Accident Lawyers, The Strong Arm®, is Colorado's largest personal injury law firm and a leading Aurora car accident attorney. In addition to auto, motorcycle, pedestrian, ridesh...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 1,602 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
66%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
37%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 118.9 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
1922 (84%)
4 star
135 (5.9%)
3 star
33 (1.4%)
2 star
23 (1%)
1 star
178 (7.8%)
89% positive reviews 10% negative reviews Consistency index: 74.9

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 37% of reviews
case results 17.9% of reviews
professionalism 17.7% of reviews
communication 13.1% of reviews
speed 8.6% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (12.6%)
poor communication (4.4%)
slow process (2.7%)

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 2,291 retrieved reviews and 1,602 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:24Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:50:04Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:58.
  • 2,291 total Google reviews tracked; 2,291 reviews retrieved; 1,602 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Aurora truck-accident lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →