Eric Blank Injury Attorneys Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

7860 W Sahara Ave Ste. 110, Las Vegas, NV 89117

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.8
464 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Eric Blank Injury Attorneys is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 4.8-star rating across 464 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 463 reviews for this profile and analyzed 420 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 62% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 91.2.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (64%), case results (26%), and professionalism (17%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Eric Blank Injury Attorneys Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (64%), case results (26%), and professionalism (17%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Eric Blank Injury Attorneys legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Eric Blank Injury Attorneys at 7860 W Sahara Ave Ste. 110, Las Vegas, NV 89117. The listing has 464 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Eric Blank Injury Attorneys a good law firm?

Eric Blank Injury Attorneys has a 4.8/5 public Google rating across 464 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 463 reviews and analyzed 420 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 62% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Eric Blank Injury Attorneys reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (7%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Eric Blank Injury Attorneys respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 62% of the reviews retrieved for Eric Blank Injury Attorneys. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 10% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score68.6/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile33.3th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews464Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved463Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed420Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate62%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate64%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions10%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index91.2Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

68.6/100

Score percentile

33.3th percentile

Rating percentile

46.7th percentile

Review-count percentile

66.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 420 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-47b3e1ac53a1f448
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-ba0fce38d20ff215
Brand relationship
Eric Blank Injury Attorneys

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.5
Avg Review Length
218 chars
Local Guide %
15%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

About

Eric Blank Injury Attorneys have an established reputation in the Las Vegas legal community for successfully representing clients in personal injury matters (Car Accident Lawyer) throughout Clark Coun...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 420 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
62%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
64%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
17%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
26%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 156.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
431 (93%)
4 star
14 (3%)
3 star
3 (<1%)
2 star
4 (<1%)
1 star
12 (2.6%)
96% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 91.2

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 63.8% of reviews
case results 25.7% of reviews
professionalism 16.9% of reviews
communication 10.2% of reviews
speed 8.3% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (6.7%)

Other Medical Malpractice in Las Vegas

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 463 retrieved reviews and 420 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:09Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:32:15Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:57.
  • 464 total Google reviews tracked; 463 reviews retrieved; 420 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →