Cofer & Connelly Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

602 W 11th St, Austin, TX 78701

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.9
417 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Cofer & Connelly is a law firm in Austin, Texas with a 4.9-star rating across 417 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 417 reviews for this profile and analyzed 359 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 52% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (39%), and communication (29%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving motorcycle, medical malpractice, and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Cofer & Connelly Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (39%), and communication (29%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Cofer & Connelly legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Cofer & Connelly at 602 W 11th St, Austin, TX 78701. The listing has 417 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Cofer & Connelly a good law firm?

Cofer & Connelly has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 417 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 417 reviews and analyzed 359 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 52% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 29% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Cofer & Connelly reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (20%) and passed around (20%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Cofer & Connelly respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 52% of the reviews retrieved for Cofer & Connelly. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 29% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score78.7/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile64th percentileCompared with the fixed Austin, TX cohort.
Tracked Google reviews417Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved417Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed359Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate52%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate71%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions29%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Austin, TX

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

78.7/100

Score percentile

64th percentile

Rating percentile

56th percentile

Review-count percentile

88th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 359 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-a7df51b909d99d81
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-37919ad584b60a3b
Brand relationship
Cofer & Connelly

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

motorcyclemedical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.6
Avg Review Length
378 chars
Local Guide %
23%

Practice Areas

Criminal justice attorneyDivorce lawyerFamily law attorneyPersonal injury attorney

About

At Cofer & Connelly, our attorneys in Austin are backed by over 200 years of combined experience and have successfully handled thousands of criminal defense, family law, and personal injury cases in c...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 359 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
52%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
71%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
39%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 105.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
407 (98%)
4 star
2 (<1%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
7 (1.7%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 70.8% of reviews
professionalism 38.7% of reviews
communication 29.2% of reviews
expertise 13.9% of reviews
dedication 13.4% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (20%)
passed around (20%)

Other Personal Injury in Austin

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 417 retrieved reviews and 359 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:11Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:31:55Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:59.
  • 417 total Google reviews tracked; 417 reviews retrieved; 359 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Austin personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Texas personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →