1610 Arden Wy #280, Sacramento, CA 95815
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
AutoAccident.com is a personal injury attorney in Sacramento, California with a 4.9-star rating across 419 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 422 reviews for this profile and analyzed 390 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 77% of retrieved reviews, 76% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 94.1.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (76%), professionalism (39%), and case results (24%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (76%), professionalism (39%), and case results (24%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for AutoAccident.com at 1610 Arden Wy #280, Sacramento, CA 95815. The listing has 419 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
AutoAccident.com has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 419 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 422 reviews and analyzed 390 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 77% of retrieved reviews, 76% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (27%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 77% of the reviews retrieved for AutoAccident.com. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 17% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 77.1/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 78.9th percentile | Compared with the fixed Sacramento, CA cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 419 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 422 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 390 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 77% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 76% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 17% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 94.1 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
77.1/100
Score percentile
78.9th percentile
Rating percentile
84.2th percentile
Review-count percentile
84.2th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 390 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
5.1%
20 matches: 11 positive, 0 negative, 9 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
3.8%
15 matches: 14 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
3.3%
13 matches: 13 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Aug 28, 2014
Latest dated review
Apr 22, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
419 retrieved of 419 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
14
Average rating: 4.71/5
Average rating
-0.24 stars
4.71/5 in the recent period vs. 4.95/5 in the prior period
Review activity
-141 reviews
14 recent reviews vs. 155 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
71%
10 replies across 14 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
78%
316 replies across 405 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Edward A Smith Law Offices, commonly referred to as AutoAccident.com, a top-rated personal injury attorney in Sacramento, also serving Modesto, Elk Grove, and Stockton. We understand the turmoil and p...
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 390 text reviews in the current build.
Q: I bought some tacos at a toco truck and the food had glass it cut .my gums real bad
A: Hello Alejandro, Please call me privately and we can discuss based on additional facts I would need to find out.
— AutoAccident.com
Q: My friend fell in a grocery store yesterday, there was water on the floor, she broke her leg badly... What are your charges? Thank you!
A: Sorry to hear that. She is welcome to call anytime for a free, friendly consultation.
— AutoAccident.com
Q: My husband was injured (minorly) at work and was place on modified duty (not lift, pulling, etc.). His employer forced him to continue regular working duties which resulted in an even worse injury that has involved 2 surgeries. Can we sue?
A: Im not a lawyer. I would ask you to speak to one however.
— Shaun Powers
Q: What we should do. If the foster parent negligent my nephew. And he die and drown in river island?
A: Call the police
— Shaun Powers
Q: My wife and I were in San Francisco and she fell head first on an uneven sidewalk and was hurt badly. Does the city have liability for this nightmare?
A: Yes, the city and adjacent landowner may both be liable. Contact us and we will be happy to go over your options with you.
— AutoAccident.com
Q: I slept on my charger and caused burns on my skin. Should that happen? What can I do?
A: Hello Iris, Please call me privately and we can discuss based on additional facts I would need to find out. I can be reached at (916) 921-6400.
— AutoAccident.com
Q: I was falsely accused of elderly abuse by my sister. It is not true. What should I do?
A: U do realize this attorney specializes in motorcycle accidents...right? Lol
— Daniel
Q: Do you have free consultations
A: Yes they do
— Daniel
Q: I was involved in an auto accident August 30,2017,the driver went through a red light and broad sided me flipping my truck,she was cited for failing to yield at a red light,what is your fee if you take the case?
A: Pete, call me privately and we can discuss based on additional facts I would need to find out.
— AutoAccident.com